Holliday v. Long Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GILLIAM, District Judge.
These two actions were consolidated for hearing. Both plaintiffs allege patent infringement and unfair competition in the defendants’ production and sale of a tobacco harvesting machine. The same facts are at issue in both cases.
The parties consented at the trial to dismiss the defendants Long Supply Company, Inc., John G. Long, and James O. Hall from the action brought by Hoi*529liday and Harrington Manufacturing Company, Inc., against Long Manufacturing Company, Inc., et al. Similarly, C. B. Stanfield, Y. E. Fountain, Ethel J. Harrington, and Ethel B. Harrington were…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Honolulu Oil Corp. v. Shelby Poultry Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Dick E. Stearns and the D. E. Stearns Company, a Partnership Composed of Dick E. Stearns and Ellen Belson Stearns v. Tinker & Rasor, a Corporation, John P. Rasor and Leo H. Tinker, Tinker & Rasor, a Corporation, John P. Rasor and Leo H. Tinker v. Dick E. Stearns and the D. E. Stearns Company, a Partnership Composed of Dick E. Stearns and Ellen Belson StearnsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Davis Harvester Co. v. Long Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
- Honolulu Oil Corporation v. Shelby Poultry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961