Fish v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
This is an appeal from a district court judgment reversing the order of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services (commissioner) and concluding that respondent could properly deduct monthly social security disability insurance from his income when calculating the monthly spend-down for medical assistance and that respondent qualified for the home-maintenance deduction set out in Minn.Stat. § 256B.0575 (2006). We reverse the district court’s determination regarding the monthly spend-down deduction and hold that the commissioner was correct in finding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Rosckes v. County of CarverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010