In Re Rosckes v. County of Carver
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORKE, Judge.
Appellant-trustee, on his own behalf and on behalf of the decedent’s estate, argues that funds in the decedent’s trust were not available to her for purposes of determining medical-assistance eligibility, and also seeks to recover fees and other costs from the state under Minn.Stat. § 15.472 (2008). Respondents argue that the district court did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to consider this appeal because the notice of appeal of the commissioner’s decision filed in district court was deficient. Respondents also argue that the trustee lacked standing to bring this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Cohen v. Commissioner of the Division of Medical AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- In Re the Estate of BargSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Tischer v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of CambridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Dorothy Lollar v. Department of Human Services DirectorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Mary Ann Hegadorn v. Department of Human Services DirectorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Roselyn Ford v. Department of Health and Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017