Hardee, Sons & Co. v. Griner
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice in Supreme Court. Promissory notes. Contracts. Evidence. Yerdict. New trial. Before Judge Atkinson. Pierce county. At chambers, February 1. 1887. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
The suit was on a promissory note, and brought origi *560lially in a justice’s court. The summons alleged indebtedness upon the note, making no mention of any collateral promise connected therewith; but following a copy of the note annexed to the summons, was the copy of a promise in writing signed by the same parties who made the note. That promise recited the giving of a note corresponding in amount with this one, but describing it as payable on the 1st day of October, 1S81; whereas, the note sued on and set out by copy was not payable then, but was payable the 1st of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South Carolina Railroad v. NixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- DeBarry-Baya Merchants' Line v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Martin v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Pritchard v. Johnson & CalhounSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Stanford v. TreadwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Alexander v. ChipsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Rabhan v. RabhanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Hall County v. GilmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.