Legal Opinion

DeBarry-Baya Merchants' Line v. Austin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 30, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Practice in Supreme Court. Practice in Superior Court-New Trial. Before Judge Harden. City Court of Savannah. November Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

-Jackson, Chief Justice.

At the first term of the court, on return of the writ, the ’defendant demurred, and on the demurrer being overruled at that term, he then filed an interlocutory bill of exceptions pendente lite. At Jhe .next term, the case was tried and verdict returned for the plaintiff. Thereupon, defendant brought- his writ of .error ■ here, assigning as error the judgment at the first term overruling his demurrer then, and alleging that he then filed the ■ interlocutory bill of -exceptions. It is also alleged that he made a motion for a mew trial, on the sole ground that the court…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Willbanks v. UntrinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Barge v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Hardee, Sons & Co. v. GrinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Carrington v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API