Legal Opinion

Martin v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Pleadings. Contract. Evidence. Before Judge Hood. Terrell Superior Court. May Term, 1879. Report unnecessary.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Justice.

The plaintiff in error urged fraud, and insisted that the article delivered was different from the one bargained for. He cited 1 Smith’s L. C., 220 ; Code, §2751; 52. Ga., 191; and Allen vs. Young, last term. The defendant in error cited 57 Ga., 350 ; 60 lb., 288, 383. The view which the court took of the case will appear from reading the head-notes, these indicating the reasons for judgment as well as the points adjudged. It was not alleged that the fertilizer was not properly branded, and hence Kleckley vs. Leyden, this term, does not apply.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goodman v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gunn v. Wilson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. McNeel v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Hardee, Sons & Co. v. GrinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Watkins v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Walnut Creek Milling Co. v. Smith Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934