Legal Opinion
Weinberg v. Wilensky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 17, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
26 N.J. Super. 301 (1953)
97 A.2d 707
ARTHUR WEINBERG AND SHEILA WEINBERG, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
JULIUS WILENSKY AND TIL WILENSKY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 8, 1953.
Decided June 17, 1953.
Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and FRANCIS.
Mr. Edward A. Levy argued the cause for the defendants-appellants (Messrs. Levy & Levy, attorneys).
Mr. John F. Crane argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Irving Robert Zager, attorney; Mr. Irving Lloyd Gang, of counsel).
STANTON, J.A.D. (temporarily assigned).
On March 13, 1951 the plaintiffs and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dieckman v. WalserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Frelinghuysen v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Bull v. WillardNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Smith v. Colonial Woodworking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Laurel Realty Co. v. HimelfarbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weck v. A:M Sunrise Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Levy v. C. Young Construction Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Jefferson v. Bay Isles Associates L.L.L.P.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- Weck v. A:M Sunrise Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962