Legal Opinion

Dieckman v. Walser

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 16, 1933PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The mortgage foreclosed in this proceeding covered tracts numbered 2, 3 and 4. At the time of the conveyance of tracts 2 and 3 to 1231 Boulevard East Corporation, the amount due on the decree was $35,000, pins interest. Vice-Chancellor Bigelow found that the grantee of lots 2 and 3 assumed the payment of the full sum due upon the decree, and gave effect to that undertaking. This finding of fact is amply supported by the proofs.

Respondent alleged an oral assumption agreement. The deed conveyed the lands “subject to mortgages and taxes.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edmundson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Gage v. CameronIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Herrin v. AbbeSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Way v. GreerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Cabrera v. American Colonial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Levy v. C. Young Construction Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  4. Irvington v. OllemarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  5. Mc-Donald v. MianeckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API