Legal Opinion
Frelinghuysen v. Town of Morristown
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 4, 1909PublishedCited by 26 opinions
On error to Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 47 Vroom 271.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
PitNey, CHANCELLOR.
We concur in the result reached by the Supreme Court, and agree for the most part with the reasoning expressed in the opinion delivered by Nfr. Justice Swayze in that court.
In our opinion the act under which Morristown has proceeded to establish a system of sewers, including the disposal works whose location gives rise to the present controversy, that is to say, “An act to authorize incorporated towns to construct, operate and maintain a system of sewers, or a system of sewers and drains, and to provide for the payment of the *494costs…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Gabriel v. Auf Der Heide-Aragona, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Battaglia v. BD. OF REVIEW, EMPLOYMENT SEC. DIV.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Strube v. Travelers Indemn. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- CASSAN EX REL. CASSAN v. FernNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.