Legal Opinion

Laurel Realty Co. v. Himelfarb

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 1950No. [No. 109, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

This appeal is from a decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City awarding damages of $575 for breach of a contract relating to the construction and sale of a house. The bill was for specific performance, or in the alternative for damages. In a former appeal we sustained an order overruling a demurrer to the amended bill. Laurel Realty Co. v. Himelfarb, 191 Md. 462, 471, 62 A. 2d 263, 267. We held that the written contract filed with the bill on its face was not complete, and could properly be supplemented by proof of the oral agreements alleged in the bill; that the contract was not within…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hammaker v. SchleighCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  2. Edison Realty Co. v. BauernschubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Rosenthal v. HeftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Messick v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Levin v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weck v. A:M Sunrise Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. Ace Development Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Gilbert Construction Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Kandalis v. Paul Pet Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Barrie v. AbateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API