Legal Opinion

Home Lumber & Coal Co. v. Hartford Mining Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1938No. 3218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, C. J.:

Plaintiff, respondent here, brought suit to foreciose two mechanic’s liens, one assigned to it by Commercial Hardware Company. None of the defendants appeared except Hartford Mining Company, and judgment was rendered against it alone upon both causes of action, from which, and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, an appeal has been taken.

The defendant denied the allegations, in the two causes of action, of sale and delivery of merchandise for which lien and judgment were sought.

Defendant assigned four errors to rulings of the trial court.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chan Kiu Sing v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lamb v. Goldfield Lucky Boy Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Tonopah Lumber Co. v. Nevada Amusement Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Robison v. MathisNevada Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hartford Mining Co. v. Home Lumber & Coal Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API