Chan Kiu Sing v. Gordon
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants appealed from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The appellants executed to the plaintiffs a lease for twenty acres of agricultural land planted in asparagus, for the term of one year ending July 31, 1911. The plaintiffs claim that, upon the expiration of said term they held over for more than sixty days, and that, thereby, the said lease was renewed, under section 1161 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for another year expiring July 31, 1912. In January, 1912, without the consent and against the will of plaintiffs, the appellants, and others…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Roche v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Landis v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kerns v. McKeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Watrous v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Osborne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Richmond v. FrederickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Storm & Butts v. LipscombCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Central Bank of Oakland v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Waring v. PitcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.