Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Goldfield Lucky Boy Mining Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1914No. 1976PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Seventh Judicial District Court, Esmeralda County; Theron Stevens, Judge. Action by John B. Lamb against the Goldfield Lucky Boy Mining Company and another. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

McCarran, J.:

This is an action to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Two causes of action were asserted by appellant, plaintiff in the court below. The Goldfield Aristock Mining and Leasing Company was the lessee of those certain lode mining claims known as Lucky Boy No. 1 and Lucky Boy No. 2. The Goldfield Lucky Boy Mining Company was the owner of the claims and the lessor. The second cause of action relied upon by appellant is based upon services performed upon the property and a claim of lien filed pursuant thereto by George B. Crowell, the latter’s claim of lien having been, for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dougherty-Moss Lumber Co. v. ChurchillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Wilkins v. AbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Jones v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. Rosina v. TrowbridgeNevada Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Higgins v. Carlotta Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilmington Trust FSB v. A1 Concrete Cutting & Demolition, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hendrix v. Gold Ridge Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Peccole v. Luce & Goodfellow, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Schofield v. Copeland Lumber Yards, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Fisher Brothers, Inc. v. Harrah Realty Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API