Crozier v. Fried. Krupp Aktiengesellschaft
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The facts, which involve the right of a patentee to enjoin an officer of the United States from using the patent, and the construction and effect of the act of June 25,1910, conferring jurisdiction on the Court of Claims in certain instances of claims of patentees against the United States, for use of patents, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White
The defendant, a corporation organized under the laws of the German Empire, commenced this suit on June 8, 1907; in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Relief was sought because of alleged infringements of three described letters patent of the United States, origi- ■ nally issued in the name of Fried. Krupp and assigned to the corporation. Two of the patents, numbered 722,724 and 722,725, were granted in 1903, and the third, issued in 1905, was numbered 791,347. The patents related to improvements in guns and gun carriages. The petitioner here, William Crozier, was named as sole…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Belknap v. SchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Sweet v. RechelSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.