Legal Opinion
Board of Commissioners v. ArmStrong
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1883No. 11,081PublishedCited by 38 opinions
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.
— This was a proceeding based upon a claim filed against the board of commissioners of Howard county, for the refunding of taxes under sections 5813 and 5814 of the Eevised Statutes of 1881.
Addison F. Armstrong as claimant, in the similitude of a complaint, charged that he was guardian of the persons .and ■estates of Carrie E.' Matlock and Sabert S. Matlock, minor heirs at law of Jackson Matlock, deceased, and that on the 26th day of February, 1881, there was standing against him as such guardian, on the tax duplicate of' Howard county as taxes assessed on the property of his wards, the sum…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lamborn v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Town of Ligonier v. AckermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Board of Comm'rs v. RuckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- State ex rel. MacKenzie v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Durham v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Stewart Law & Collection Co. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Board of Commissioners v. EmmersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.