Brill v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
These several causes for the recovery of taxes based on alleged excessive assessments for the year 1932 have been consolidated and are before us on appeals from judgments on the pleadings in favor of the defendant city.
In each cause the tax sought to be recovered had been assessed and collected by the defendant county for and on behalf of the defendant city. So far as pertinent here, section 6 of article XI of the Constitution provides that “Cities and towns . . . may, by charter provision or amendment, provide for the performance by county officers of certain of their municipal functions.”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Farmers & Merchs.' Bank of L.A. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- McCann v. Sierra CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Rhoda v. Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1877
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Buckley v. CoreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Burum v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estate of ReinhertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.