Legal Opinion
PAM, S.P.A. & JCM, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 14, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-124; Court 04-00082PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge.
Plaintiffs PAM, S.p.A (“PAM”) and JCM, Ltd. (“JCM”) 1 appeal the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Defendant”) final results of Certain Pasta from Italy, 69 Fed.Reg. 6,255 (Dep’t Commerce Feb. 10, 2004) (final determination) [hereinafter Final Results ]. Plaintiffs challenge the initiation of the review, the application of adverse facts and selection of the highest anti-dumping margin. Plaintiffs move for judgment upon the agency record. For the following reasons, this Court grants Plaintiffs’ motions for judgment on the agency record, holds void ab…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pam, S.P.A., and Jcm, Ltd. v. United States, and A. Zerega's & Sons, Dakota Growers Pasta Co., New World Pasta Co., and American Italian Pasta Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Guangdong Chemicals Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- PAM, S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Suntec Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Lincoln General Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.