Legal Opinion · Dissent

St. Johns River Water Management District v. Koontz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 30, 2014No. 5D06-1116Published

1DissentGriffin, J.

The decision of the majority to affirm the judgment in favor of Coy A. Koontz, Jr. [“Koontz”] without any further work from this Court is both incorrect and unfair. If there is to be a summary disposition of this case, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2586, 186 L.Ed.2d 697 (2013), that disposition must be in favor of the St. Johns Water Management District [the “District”], not Koontz.

This case began in 1994. Koontz filed an inverse condemnation suit,- claiming that there had been a regulatory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. St. Johns River Water Management District v. KoontzSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API