St. Johns River Water Management District v. Koontz
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentGriffin, J.
The decision of the majority to affirm the judgment in favor of Coy A. Koontz, Jr. [“Koontz”] without any further work from this Court is both incorrect and unfair. If there is to be a summary disposition of this case, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2586, 186 L.Ed.2d 697 (2013), that disposition must be in favor of the St. Johns Water Management District [the “District”], not Koontz.
This case began in 1994. Koontz filed an inverse condemnation suit,- claiming that there had been a regulatory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- St. Johns River Water Management District v. KoontzSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.