Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Bunn

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1997No. A071225PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PHELAN, P. J.

The People appeal from an order by which the Lake County Superior Court denied their motion to reinstate the first amended complaint filed against respondent Ronald Stacy Bunn (Bunn). (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(9).) 1 That complaint, filed March 3, 1995, contained 5 counts of forcible rape of a person under the age of 18 (§ 261, subd. (a)(2)), and 1 count of oral copulation with a person under the age of 18 (§ 288a, subd. (b)(1)), based on allegations that Bunn sexually molested his daughter during a 6-month period in 1981, when she was 15 and 16 years old. 2 The motion…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. AngelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. LeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Dozier v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API