Legal Opinion

Dozier v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2008No. 47367PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*126OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

Appellant Clarence James Dozier appeals from an order of the district court denying his post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In his petition, Dozier contended, among other things, that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge a jury instruction providing that the State had the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that some of the charges at issue were committed in a secret manner and were therefore not barred by the statute of limitations. In addressing the district court’s decision rejecting this claim, we now…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Warden, Nevada State Prison v. LyonsNevada Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. Auburn and Bradford at Providence Homeowners' AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  2. Bork v. GentryDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  3. In re: ANTONIA ANDRADE-GARCIAUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. MCNAMARA (JAMES) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2016
  5. MCNAMARA (JAMES) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API