Legal Opinion

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Clayton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1942No. 2440PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

The Interstate Commerce Commission brought this action against Clayton to enjoin him from holding himself out as a common carrier or contract carrier in interstate commerce for compensation without complying with the requirements of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. A. §§ 301-327. The trial court denied the injunction. The Interstate Commerce Commission has appealed.

The facts are these: Clayton resides at Ucon, Idaho. He maintains a small coal yard at his home, where he normally keeps on hand about ten tons or a truckload of coal. He has customers in…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brooks Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Tank Car Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  3. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  4. Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  5. Shippers Cooperative, Inc., a Corporation, and Pierson-Corn, Inc., a Corporation v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API