Interstate Commerce Commission v. Clayton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The Interstate Commerce Commission brought this action against Clayton to enjoin him from holding himself out as a common carrier or contract carrier in interstate commerce for compensation without complying with the requirements of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. A. §§ 301-327. The trial court denied the injunction. The Interstate Commerce Commission has appealed.
The facts are these: Clayton resides at Ucon, Idaho. He maintains a small coal yard at his home, where he normally keeps on hand about ten tons or a truckload of coal. He has customers in…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Brooks Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Tank Car Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1945
- Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
- Shippers Cooperative, Inc., a Corporation, and Pierson-Corn, Inc., a Corporation v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.