Legal Opinion
Ensworth v. Mullvain
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 24, 1990No. B043890PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Appellant Cynthia Mullvain (Mullvain) appeals from the issuance of a restraining order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6, 1 granted in favor of respondent Heather Ensworth (Ensworth). We find the statutory requirements for issuing the injunction were met by the evidence presented by Ensworth, and we affirm the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
Ensworth was a psychologist practicing in Pasadena. Mullvain was her patient from November 1982 until September 1984, at which time Ens-worth terminated the treatment. Apparently, Mullvain did not accept the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Brokopp v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Schild v. RubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Kenne v. StennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- R.D. v. P.M.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Harris v. StampolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.