Legal Opinion

R.D. v. P.M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 2011No. B229681PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANEY, J.

Therapist R.D. believed she was being stalked and harassed by P.M., a former patient.1 On June 1, 2009, R.D. obtained a one-year civil harassment restraining order under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6. The order restrained P.M. from harassing or contacting R.D. or her family, and prohibited P.M. from coming within 100 yards of R.D., her office, her family members, or her children’s schools.

After the restraining order’s one-year term expired at the end of May 2010, however, P.M.’s harassment resumed—or so R.D. believed. She was confronted by P.M. at her local market in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. DVD Copy Control Ass'n, Inc. v. BunnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. KedzierskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Harris v. StampolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Parisi v. MazzaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Cooper v. BettingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Alcaraz v. Fede CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API