Legal Opinion

Glynn v. Marquette

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1984No. Civ. 68810PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

In this action for specific performance, the successful plaintiff appeals from an order after judgment which denied plaintiff’s request for an award of attorney’s fees.

Since the judgment granting specific performance is not in question on this appeal, the background facts may be briefly summarized from the trial court’s statement of decision. On June 28 and 29, 1977, appellant Daniel R. Glynn, as buyer, and defendant Beulah Wende (not a party to this appeal), as seller, entered into a valid written agreement as evidenced by a deposit receipt and escrow instructions for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Babcock v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Saucedo v. Mercury Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Copple v. AigeltingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cottonwood Christian Center v. Cypress Redevelopment AgencyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  2. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Real Property Services Corp. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Wilson's Heating & Air Conditioning v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Selma Auto Mall II v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API