Legal Opinion
In re Crescenzi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 21, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee has moved for an order disbarring respondent for his willful and unlawful failure to comply with this court’s order, entered October 5, 1982 (90 AD2d 453), suspending him from practice, upon the grounds that he is suffering from mental and physical disabilities which make it impossible for him to reply to petitioner’s investigation of various complaints lodged against him. The DDC also seeks to hold respondent in criminal contempt for violation of the October 5, 1982 order, as, well as a March 14, 1985 order (109 AD2d 655) enjoining…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re TeplinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re StallerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re NitsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
4Cited by5 opinions
- Crescenzi v. Supreme Court of State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In re AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re OlittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re CrescenziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989