Legal Opinion
Crescenzi v. Supreme Court of State of NY
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 30, 1990No. 89 Civ. 2569 (JES)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
The above-captioned habeas corpus petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), was referred to Magistrate Naomi Reice Buchwald for a report and recommendation and the Magistrate recommended that the petition be dismissed. For the reasons that follow, the report is adopted insofar as it recommends that the petition be dismissed because petitioner has concededly failed to exhaust available state remedies.
BACKGROUND
The facts relevant to the determination of this action are set forth in the Magistrate’s report and are briefly summarized…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Castille v. PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Velez v. People of the State of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- D'Ottavio v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Lopez v. CapraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Mayo v. ClevelandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Mayo v. MontagariDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.