Legal Opinion

In re Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Kenneth F. Anderson, as Kenneth Frederick *147Anderson, II, was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on September 17, 1979. At all times pertinent to this proceeding respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

This court previously has determined that respondent had violated Code of Professional Responsibility DR 9-102 (A) and 22 NYCRR 603.15 by failing to segregate in a special account the client’s portion of bail money returned to respondent by the bondsman; DR 1-102 (A)…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re BrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re ElliottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. In re CrescenziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. In re AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. In re OlittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re StreitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re MannanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API