Legal Opinion

In re Crescenzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*87OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

On April 21, 1988 the court directed that respondent be disbarred, found him guilty of civil and criminal contempt, and referred the matter to the Office of Special Referees to report on a recommended sanction (136 AD2d 386). The basis of our decision was respondent’s continuing practice of law after he had been suspended for failing to cooperate with an investigation into serious charges of misconduct against him, including theft of estate moneys. While under suspension respondent continued to represent clients in court, listed himself in the telephone book and on legal…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. In re CrescenziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crescenzi v. Supreme Court of State of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. In re OlittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API