Legal Opinion

In re Nitsberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was indefinitely suspended in 1974 (Matter of Nitsberg, 44 AD2d 826).

The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District has brought to our attention the fact that the respondent was practicing law in Nassau County, with a law office and a telephone listing and advertising in the local newspaper.

The original suspension was made in the course of a disciplinary proceeding on the basis of the respondent’s *490mental incapacity due to psychiatric problems. His attorney now attempts to excuse the violation of subdivision 2 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law on the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re NitsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re TeplinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. In re StallerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. In re CrescenziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. In re JavitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. In re GlassmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API