Seidner v. Dill

Charles Dill, appellee, brought this .action in the Municipal Court of Marion County, Indiana, therein, alleging that the defendant-appellant, Harold Seidner, maliciously and intentionally shot and killed plaintiff’s dog.. Defendant answered in compliance with Rule 1-3, and by filing a second paragraph of affirmative answer alleging:

“That a dog of unknown breed and unknown .ownership was roaming over the country, unat*179tended by its master or owner or its owner’s agent, and did enter upon the property of the defendant and attacked his fowl, and that in defense of his personal property the…