Legal Opinion

Illinois Farmers Insurance v. Laughlin

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided June 11, 1987No. IP 86-322-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STECKLER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. This rule states, in part, that:

The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). In ruling on a summary judgment motion, the district court must examine the evidence in the light most…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,905 Shirley Black v. Henry Pratt Company and Amsted IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. The United States Shoe Corporation v. Patrick A. Hackett and Rosemary H. HackettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Fowler v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO. OF IND.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Seidner v. DillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LathamDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API