Puckett v. Miller
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
*184DISSENTING OPINION
Hoffman, Judge
I dissent from the majority opinion.
I concur in Judge Chipman’s concurring opinion regarding the TR. 41(B) motion.
However, the court committed further error in that it did not construe IC 1971,15-5-8-1, Ind.Ann.Stat. § 16-203 (Burns Code Ed.) and IC 1971,15-5-8-3, Ind.Ann.Stat. § 16-204 (Burns Code Ed.) as interpreted in Seidner v. Dill (1965), 137 Ind.App. 177, 206 N.E.2d 636.
Seidner v. Dill, supra, correctly interprets those statutes, especially the well-reasoned and eloquent concurring opinion of Justice Hunter.
I would reverse the trial court.
NOTE — Reported…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Puckett v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Seidner v. DillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965