Legal Opinion

Puckett v. Miller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1978No. 3-977A221PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*175Staton, J.

Charles Miller shot and killed Ernest Puckett, Jr.’s two coon dogs. Puckett sued Miller for the negligent destruction of his dogs. After Puckett rested his case, Miller moved for an involuntary dismissal. The trial court granted the motion. Puckett appeals. We affirm.

I

Trial Rule 41(B) Motion

Puckett argues that because the trial judge granted Miller’s motion for judgment on the evidence, involuntary dismissal — Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 41(B), the judge necessarily weighed the evidence. Puckett characterizes such weighing as harmful error. Before we reach the question of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ayr-Way Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood Ex Rel. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Building Systems, Inc. v. Rochester Metal Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Wayne Township v. Lutheran HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lachenman v. SticeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Ferdinand Furn. Co., Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Stephenson v. FrazierIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Vetor ex rel. Weesner v. VetorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Juan Vega v. City of Hammond and City of Hammond Board of Public Works and SafetyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API