Legal Opinion

Walker v. Towle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1901No. 18,728PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From tbe Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

-Appellee brought this action against appellants to recover damages for killing appellee’s dog. A hear-ing by jury resulted in a vérdict, and, over a motion for a new trial, judgment in favor of appellee.

It is assigned for error that the court erred in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to appellants’ second paragraph of answer. Said second paragraph of answer is, in substance, that the city of Hammond, on a public street of which appellee’s dog was killed, is and was a duly incorporated city in this State. That appellants, Mott and Walker, were, at the time Walker shot said dog, the mayor and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Blue v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. In Re KollockSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Blair v. ForehandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Arnett v. State, ex rel. DonohueIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Freigy v. Gargaro Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Voss v. Waterloo Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Muncie Natural Gas Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API