Legal Opinion

Mullet v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 19, 1991No. 2 CA-SA 91-0019PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner Michael Mullet (Mullet) seeks special action relief from the order of the respondent judge denying his motion to dismiss the underlying criminal charges on double jeopardy grounds in light of a prior proceeding before and an order entered by the Arizona Corporation Commission (the Commission). Because this is a matter of statewide importance and requires consideration of legal issues as opposed to controverted questions of fact, we accept jurisdiction. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior Court, 136 Ariz. 579, 667 P.2d 1294 (1983).…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Taylor v. SherrillArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API