Taylor v. Sherrill
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The state seeks review of a court of appeals’ opinion holding that the double jeopardy clause of the United States Con stitution applied to, and prohibited prosecution of, defendant’s pending felony charges of aggravated assault and criminal damage. We granted the state’s petition for review in part, and have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
PROCEEDINGS IN THE TRIAL COURTS
On July 18, 1988, John Hubert Taylor (defendant) turned left into oncoming traffic and collided with another automobile, injuring its…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HincheyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. YoungbloodArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State of Arizona v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Rehg v. Illinois Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.