Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy W. Collins

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 27, 1990No. 90-6077PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Roy Collins was convicted by a jury on three counts of federal income tax evasion, 26 U.S.C. § 7201. He now appeals arguing that the district court improperly instructed the jury on the issue of good faith and violated his sixth amendment right to counsel by revoking the pro hac vice admission of his privately retained attorney. Our jurisdiction over this direct criminal appeal arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

I. Good Faith.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, United States v. Spedalieri, 910 F.2d 707, 708 (10th…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. United States v. John Javilo McCullahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Martens v. ThomannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Hilario Mendoza-Salgado, United States of America v. Ramon Edwardo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Belue v. LeventhalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API