State v. Edwards
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s failure to grant his motion to quash the indictment. He contends that the indictment was defective in that it did not allege that he committed a “sexual act” with the victim. He argues that since a “sexual act” is an essential element of first-degree sexual offense it must be alleged in the bill of indictment.
Defendant was tried under G.S. 14-27.4(a)(l), which states that:(a) A person is guilty of a sexual offense in the first degree if the person engages in a sexual act:(1) With a victim who is a child of the age of 12…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. LindleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. EfflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- In re J.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.