State v. Lowe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
By his first assignment of error defendant contends that the indictment upon which he was tried is insufficient to charge him with first-degree rape under G.S. 14-21 and that his motion in arrest of judgment was therefore improperly denied. He argues that G.S. 15-144.1, a newly enacted statute which purports to prescribe the. essentials for a bill of indictment for rape, must be construed to require allegation of each statutory element of the degree of rape sought to be charged under G.S. 14-21 if the indictment is to be saved from constitutional infirmity. He contends that an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. CokerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.