Legal Opinion

Sherburne County Social Services Ex Rel. Schafer v. Riedle

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 18, 1992No. C8-91-1036PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Gregory J. Riedle appeals from an order determining his child support obligations. We hold that periodic annuity payments from a structured settlement for a tort action were properly included as income when the trial court calculated Riedle’s support obligation. Because the support award deviates upward from the guidelines and there are no findings to support the departure, we reverse and remand the support award.

FACTS

Sherburne County brought an action in December 1990 to adjudicate paternity and establish child support. Riedle acknowledged paternity. The child receives…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Thompson v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Marriage of Herrley v. HerrleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arneson v. ArnesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In re JeromeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. Villanueva v. O'GaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Eisenschenk v. EisenschenkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Shae v. ShaeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API