Legal Opinion

Marriage of Herrley v. Herrley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1990No. C4-89-1213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Blue Earth County appeals an order determining Ronald Herrley’s ongoing reimbursement obligations under Minn.Stat. § 256.87 (1988). On appeal we hold that periodic impairment compensation was incorrectly excluded from the obligation calculation and that the amount of the obligation must be specifically stated rather than subject to automatic modification upon an increase in income.

FACTS

Ronald and Kathleen Herrley’s marriage was dissolved by judgment in 1981. The trial court placed custody of their three children with Kathleen Herrley and ordered Ronald Herrley to pay $30…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Giesner v. GiesnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Sommer v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. County of Nicollet v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Marriage of Keil v. KeilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sherburne County Social Services Ex Rel. Schafer v. RiedleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API