Legal Opinion

Eisenschenk v. Eisenschenk

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 9, 2003No. C2-03-343PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

On appeal from the district court’s review of a child support magistrate’s ruling, appellant challenges the district court’s refusal to rule that the magistrate lacked jurisdiction over respondent’s motion for support from appellant. Appellant also challenges the propriety of attributing income to her, the amount of income attributed to her, and the district court’s decision to make her support obligation effective as of the date of a prior stipulated order giving respondent custody of the parties’ children. Because the magistrate had jurisdiction and because the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Odenthal v. Minnesota Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Glen Paul Court Neighborhood Ass'n v. PasterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Marriage of Taflin v. TaflinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. County of Dakota v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. David P. Cook v. Wendi C. Wicktor-HeinksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. In re the Marriage of: Beverly Abuzzahab v. Faruk Said AbuzzahabCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API