Leonczak v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste Marie Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action for personal injuries. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff was a passenger on a way-freight of the defendant from Shovel Lake in Cass county to Pine Tree Spur five miles westerly. He purchased a ticket at Shovel Lake. There was another passenger for the same destination. The train did not stop, though Pine Tree Spur was a usual stopping place to take on and let off passengers. The reason assigned was that the' train was a heavy one and if stopped could not he started because of the grade; and there…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Renihan v. . DenninNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Smart v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Mutual Life Insurance v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Green v. Town of NebagamainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Street v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Kramer v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Suesbury v. CaceresDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Tweith v. Duluth, M. & I. R. RY. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.