Legal Opinion

Suesbury v. Caceres

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 2004No. 01-CV-1456PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Ernest C. Suesbury (“Suesbury”) was diagnosed with the HIV virus. Cesar A. Caceres, M.D. (“Caceres”), a principal in the medical office of Cesar Caceres, M.D., P.C., was Suesbury’s treating physician, and, as such, was privy to Suesbury’s HIV status. Suesbury sought treatment from Caceres for unrelated injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Alfred Muller, M.D. (“Muller”), another physician in Ca-ceres’ medical office, treated Suesbury during that office visit, in the course of which Suesbury mentioned his HIV condition and a T-cell reading of 700. Suesbury…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. George Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  5. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Randolph v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CO.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Herbin v. HoeffelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API