James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Streissguth, Justice.
Plaintiff was a switchman in the service of defendant at Sioux City, Iowa. While engaged in interstate switching operations, he was directed by the general yardmaster to get onto the footboard of a tender attached to a locomotive which at the time was running backward on the main line on its way to a passing track. The switch controlling the passing track was connected with a “derail,” 195 feet away, in such a manner that the closing of the switch to clear the main line threw the derail onto the passing track. The yardmaster had offered to line up the switches after the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Merritt v. StuveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Hinman v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Olson v. Purity Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Berg v. UllevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Bush v. HavirSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Kramer v. KramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.