Legal Opinion
Hake v. Eagle Picher Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 29, 1969No. 16432PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge.
Gary Hake brought an action for personal injury against Eagle Picher Company.1 Hake recovered $192,845.75 and that determination is not challenged here. Two insurance companies were brought in, and the issues on appeal relate to their coverage of Eagle Picher’s liability to Hake.
In October, 1961, Eagle Picher was engaged in widening an earthen dam on its mining property. Hake, an employee of Gensler Brothers, drove a Gens-ler truck in the course of the widening project. He was injured when the truck he was backing along the dam went over the edge. Hardware Mutual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Great American Insurance Company v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Lubow v. MorrisseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Ford Motor Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- Hake v. Eagle Picher Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- County of Wyoming, NY v. Erie Lackawanna Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1973
- Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Bats, Inc. v. ShikumaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Royal Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Gary Hake v. Eagle Picher Company, Third-Party and v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company, Third-Party Third-Party and v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., Third-Party AndCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.