Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
The ill-fated attempt of Northern Corporation to haul rock across frozen Cooper Lake at the behest of Chugach Electric Association1 gives rise to this litigation. This is a contest between Northern’s insurer and that of the trucking subcontractor who actually hauled the rock to determine which shall bear the cost of the wrongful death claims of the families of two drivers whose trucks broke through the ice and sank to the bottom of the lake. The central issues are whether Northern Corporation qualifies as an insured party under the policy of automobile insurance issued to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Marwell Construction, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Hardware Mutual Casualty v. SameCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- National Indemnity Company v. FlesherAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Afcan v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Fejes v. Alaska Ins. Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Makarka v. Great American Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Chugach Electric Ass'n v. Northern Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.