Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. of North America v. Royal Globe Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 3, 1981No. 8663-4-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

— Royal Globe Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Insurance Company of North America (INA). Each company had previously paid one-half of a judgment in favor of the State of Washington, following damage to a highway overpass negligently caused by their respective named insureds. INA moved for summary judgment contending that the employee of its named insured involved in the accident was also an insured under Royal Globe's policy, and INA was therefore entitled to reimbursement. The trial court agreed, and Royal Globe appeals.

The underlying cause of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. J. Scheer & Sons Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Department of Highways v. Evans Engine & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Steenberg Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  5. Hake v. Eagle Picher Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Protective Insurance Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.-Indianapolis-Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Earth Tech, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. Greentree Associates v. USF & G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Herring-JenkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
  5. Protective Insurance Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.-Indianapolis-Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API