Legal Opinion
Hake v. Eagle Picher Co.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 17, 1966No. Civ. No. 3640PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
Eagle Picher Company, as defendant and third-party plaintiff, has moved for summary judgment in its favor and against third-party defendant Hardware Mutual Casualty Company.
The plaintiff Hake’s amended complaint herein names Eagle Picher as defendant. Hake alleges that Eagle Picher “had engaged the use of trucks with drivers from Gensler Brothers, by whom plaintiff was employed,” for the purpose of raising the height of a certain dam or embankment situated on Eagle Picher’s premises; and “that the method of raising said dam adopted and directed by [Eagle…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Edith Joyce Murray LottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
- Prisuda v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Ermis v. Federal Windows Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of Wyoming, NY v. Erie Lackawanna Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1973
- Hake v. Eagle Picher Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Greentree Associates v. USF & G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Gary Hake v. Eagle Picher Company, Third-Party and v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company, Third-Party Third-Party and v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., Third-Party AndCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969