Legal Opinion

Woolverton v. Baker

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1893No. 15156PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

— The plaintiff alleged in her complaint that on December 3, 1878, she was the owner of certain land ir Humboldt County, which on that day she conveyed to the defendant, Erastus J. Baker, upon the consideration and condition that he would henceforth apply a sufficient portion of the rents thereof for her support and maintenance during the remainder of her natural life; that this was the only consideration for the said conveyance; and that the said defendant accepted the same upon the said consideration and condition, and that he has not since the 1st of July, 1890, applied any portion of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Taylor v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Stockton v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Parnell v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Quirk v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Reed v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Suisun Lumber Co. v. Fairfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Rauer v. RyndCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API